| 1 |
Hey, man. There are some bugs that already been solved in |
| 2 |
bugs.gentoo.org. Take a look, get the patches and try again to compile. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
IMHO, VirtualBox is too slow compared with vmware softwares. Ok, compile |
| 5 |
correctly every time, but doesn't worth it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Best Regards and Good Luck. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On 02/04/2015 03:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 11 |
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Tamas Karpati <tkarpati@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 12 |
>> Thanks for your toughts. Following your suggestion I'm going |
| 13 |
>> to evaluate VB while experimenting a bit more with WS. |
| 14 |
>> I think I'll let them compete. |
| 15 |
> If you're going to consider something new I'd certainly look at KVM as |
| 16 |
> well (libvirt/virt-manager/etc). |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I can't pretend to have done a full-feature comparison between the |
| 19 |
> various options, but the obvious advantage of KVM is that it is in the |
| 20 |
> vanilla kernel and fully open-source. Wrappers like virt-manager give |
| 21 |
> you a workstation-like presentation but all the guts are fully |
| 22 |
> command-line controllable and use standard kernel features. I don't |
| 23 |
> know if it supports snapshotting of running systems, however (ie |
| 24 |
> including RAM/hardware/etc state). |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I don't know what your exact needs are, but obviously being 100% FOSS |
| 27 |
> gives you a lot of options you won't have with any of the proprietary |
| 28 |
> stuff. If for some reason a kernel update breaks it you can complain |
| 29 |
> on lkml and watch it get fixed fast or at the very least get some |
| 30 |
> entertainment as Linus flames somebody to a crisp. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> Rich |
| 34 |
> |
Archives