Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:27:03
Message-Id: 20140528152658.GA13493@sgi.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas by Marc Joliet
1 Marc Joliet, mused, then expounded:
2 > Am Tue, 27 May 2014 15:39:38 -0700
3 > schrieb Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com>:
4 >
5 > While I am far from a filesystem/storage expert (I see myself as a mere user),
6 > the cited threads lead me to believe that this is most likely an
7 > overhyped/misunderstood class of errors (e.g., posts [1] and [2]), so I would
8 > suggest reading them in their entirety.
9 >
10 > [0] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31832
11 > [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31871
12 > [2] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31877
13 > [3] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31821
14 >
15
16 FWIW - here's the FreeNAS ZFS ECC discussion on what happens with a bad
17 memory bit and no ECC memory:
18
19 http://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/ecc-vs-non-ecc-ram-and-zfs.15449/
20
21
22 Thanks Mark! Interesting discussion on btrfs.
23
24 Bob
25
26 > HTH
27 > --
28 > Marc Joliet
29 > --
30 > "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
31 > don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
32
33
34
35 --
36 -

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de>