From: | Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas | ||
Date: | Wed, 28 May 2014 15:27:03 | ||
Message-Id: | 20140528152658.GA13493@sgi.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas by Marc Joliet |
1 | Marc Joliet, mused, then expounded: |
2 | > Am Tue, 27 May 2014 15:39:38 -0700 |
3 | > schrieb Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com>: |
4 | > |
5 | > While I am far from a filesystem/storage expert (I see myself as a mere user), |
6 | > the cited threads lead me to believe that this is most likely an |
7 | > overhyped/misunderstood class of errors (e.g., posts [1] and [2]), so I would |
8 | > suggest reading them in their entirety. |
9 | > |
10 | > [0] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31832 |
11 | > [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31871 |
12 | > [2] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31877 |
13 | > [3] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31821 |
14 | > |
15 | |
16 | FWIW - here's the FreeNAS ZFS ECC discussion on what happens with a bad |
17 | memory bit and no ECC memory: |
18 | |
19 | http://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/ecc-vs-non-ecc-ram-and-zfs.15449/ |
20 | |
21 | |
22 | Thanks Mark! Interesting discussion on btrfs. |
23 | |
24 | Bob |
25 | |
26 | > HTH |
27 | > -- |
28 | > Marc Joliet |
29 | > -- |
30 | > "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
31 | > don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
32 | |
33 | |
34 | |
35 | -- |
36 | - |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas | Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas | Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> |