Archives
Archives
| From: | Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas | ||
| Date: | Wed, 28 May 2014 15:28:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140528152822.GB13493@sgi.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas by Bob Sanders |
||
| 1 | Bob Sanders, mused, then expounded: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Marc Joliet, mused, then expounded: |
| 4 | > > Am Tue, 27 May 2014 15:39:38 -0700 |
| 5 | > > schrieb Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com>: |
| 6 | > > |
| 7 | > > While I am far from a filesystem/storage expert (I see myself as a mere user), |
| 8 | > > the cited threads lead me to believe that this is most likely an |
| 9 | > > overhyped/misunderstood class of errors (e.g., posts [1] and [2]), so I would |
| 10 | > > suggest reading them in their entirety. |
| 11 | > > |
| 12 | > > [0] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31832 |
| 13 | > > [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31871 |
| 14 | > > [2] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31877 |
| 15 | > > [3] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31821 |
| 16 | > > |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | > FWIW - here's the FreeNAS ZFS ECC discussion on what happens with a bad |
| 19 | > memory bit and no ECC memory: |
| 20 | > |
| 21 | > http://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/ecc-vs-non-ecc-ram-and-zfs.15449/ |
| 22 | > |
| 23 | > |
| 24 | > Thanks Mark! Interesting discussion on btrfs. |
| 25 | > |
| 26 | |
| 27 | Apologies - that should have been - Thanks Marc! |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | > Bob |
| 31 | > |
| 32 | > > HTH |
| 33 | > > -- |
| 34 | > > Marc Joliet |
| 35 | > > -- |
| 36 | > > "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 37 | > > don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
| 38 | > |
| 39 | > |
| 40 | > |
| 41 | > -- |
| 42 | > - |
| 43 | > |
| 44 | > |
| 45 | |
| 46 | -- |
| 47 | - |