| 1 |
Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> posted |
| 2 |
200606010953.17609.pauldv@g.o, excerpted below, on Thu, 01 Jun |
| 3 |
2006 09:53:10 +0200: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Thursday 01 June 2006 02:29, Mike Owen wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 5/31/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > perhaps -march=k8 in your CFLAGS). |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> That's probably a bad idea. Setting k8 enables the PTA_64BIT option |
| 10 |
>> in gcc, which I'm guessing won't work too well with a pure-32bit |
| 11 |
>> kernel + userland. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Actually I've been running mostly 32 bit on my athlon64 and I always use |
| 14 |
> CFLAGS="-march=athlon64". Works perfectly and stable. My guess would be |
| 15 |
> that gcc distinguishes based on what compiler it is. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I was wondering about that, but having not tried it myself, only had |
| 18 |
Mike's word to go on. This does sound reasonable, and in keeping with the |
| 19 |
general approach to things gcc seems to take. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 25 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 26 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives