1 |
In a lot of cases, for example perl, Xorg, and gcc, the Gentoo |
2 |
distribution lags far behind the latest available releases. |
3 |
Even allowing the "~amd64" unstable series, this remains true. |
4 |
Why is this so? |
5 |
|
6 |
I had first considered moving to Gentoo in the fall of 2008, |
7 |
but after noticing that the only version of gcc available at |
8 |
that time was gcc-3.x, I postponed the change. In the spring |
9 |
of 2009, Gentoo finally moved up to gcc-4.3.x and then I made |
10 |
the transition. But the update to the 4.3 series was a long time |
11 |
in coming. |
12 |
|
13 |
The latest perl, released some time ago, is version 5.10 but |
14 |
Gentoo includes only 5.8.8. |
15 |
|
16 |
The latest Xorg has restructured certain libxcb dependencies, |
17 |
which has caused a lot of problems for a lot of packages, |
18 |
and Gentoo is behind these changes as well. |
19 |
|
20 |
(Ironically, it was this libxcb issue as well as the whole Xorg |
21 |
modularity mess that first motivated me to seek out Gentoo.) |
22 |
|
23 |
Now I am not actually voicing a complaint. Gentoo, IMO, is still |
24 |
the best distribution for Linux. I am just wondering why there |
25 |
is such a great lag before a package version is deemed stable -- or |
26 |
even unstable. In my experience with maintaining my own Linux system, |
27 |
I never had any great issues with always installing the latest "bleeding" |
28 |
edge software. |
29 |
|
30 |
Frank Peters |