1 |
> In a lot of cases, for example perl, Xorg, and gcc, the Gentoo |
2 |
> distribution lags far behind the latest available releases. |
3 |
> Even allowing the "~amd64" unstable series, this remains true. |
4 |
> Why is this so? |
5 |
Xorg? We have 2.6.2_pre . gcc? We have 4.4.0 . I dont know about perl :) |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I had first considered moving to Gentoo in the fall of 2008, |
8 |
> but after noticing that the only version of gcc available at |
9 |
> that time was gcc-3.x, I postponed the change. In the spring |
10 |
> of 2009, Gentoo finally moved up to gcc-4.3.x and then I made |
11 |
> the transition. But the update to the 4.3 series was a long time |
12 |
> in coming. |
13 |
> |
14 |
We need to test them extensively. It is not just all about the ebuilds. Sure |
15 |
we can write the ebuilds of every shiny new application and put them on |
16 |
mirrors. But we want to test them before we release them. We dont want our |
17 |
users to use experimental ebuilds/software without extensive testing. |
18 |
Packaging is easy but all the background testing is hard. Our goal is not to |
19 |
provide new ebuilds as fast as we can but to provide stable and working |
20 |
applications. If this is not what you want then you can switch to another |
21 |
distro that all it does is packaging o:). Finally as you can see here |
22 |
http://cia.vc/, Gentoo is every day on the TOP10 active projects ;) |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
26 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sunrise/Sound] |
27 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |