Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is it possible to get rid of firefox?
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:19:09
Message-Id: d257c3560811181219w11b6e2aeq19ab28d143df39dc@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is it possible to get rid of firefox? by David Fellows
1 2008/11/18 David Fellows <fellows@×××.ca>:
2 > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:30:56 +0530
3 > Michael Moore wrote -
4 >> On 16:45 Tue 18 Nov , Qian Qiao wrote:
5 >> > By the look of the ebuild, it doesn't look like it wants xulrunner-bin.
6 >> >
7 >> > --
8 >> > There are 3 kinds of people in the world: those who can count, and
9 >> > those who can't.
10 >>
11 >> Indeed it doesn't. What i wanted to know was that can the bin package
12 >> provide the files needed for the softwares to compile against? If not,
13 >> then i guess i may have to stick with firefox lying around my sys.
14 >
15 > On my system equery files mozilla-firefox lists a huge include library
16 > including for instance
17 > /usr/lib64/mozilla-firefox/include/plugin/ nsIPluginInstance.h
18 > which contains comments:
19 > * DO NOT EDIT. THIS FILE IS GENERATED FROM nsIPluginInstance.idl
20 >
21 > and
22 > * The nsIPluginInstance interface is the minimum interface plugin developers
23 > * need to support in order to implement a plugin instance. The plugin manager
24 >
25 > equery files firefox-bin lists no include libraries , .h files or .idl files
26 >
27 > So, I would guess that gecko-mediaplayer probably needs the include library
28 > to build and, no, firefox-bin does not supply it.
29
30 firefox-bin is worse than firefox on an amd64 system. so, if you think
31 that a bin version would be faster than a non bin version you're quite
32 wrong. opera for what i know on amd64 is compiled for 64bit and not
33 for 32 bit and so the plugins you're using with also need to be amd64
34 compiled.
35 said this i suggest you to use mplayerplug-in instead of
36 gecko-mediaplayer. since it's produced by the same devs of mplayer and
37 you won't have api problems with it. another reason for you to use
38 mplayerplug-in is that it works with latest xulrunner and firefox
39 codebase (it's not limited to second version of firefox) and you can
40 use either the latest xulrunner, seamonkey or firefox (still
41 maintained by mozilla). on multilib systems it also automatically
42 builds the 32bit and 64bit packages depending on mplayer and
43 mplayer-bin.
44 also xulrunner is a direct dependency for firefox and if a package
45 tells you that you can build that package on xulrunner then you don't
46 really need firefox.
47
48 --
49 dott. ing. beso

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is it possible to get rid of firefox? Michael Moore <mikem.unet@×××××.com>