| 1 |
2008/5/30 Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. |
| 7 |
> Even |
| 8 |
> > > > tho I'm running only a single computer |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > there is another reason not to use paludis: |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > you can't go back. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > At least not easily. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > That is a vicious, ridiculous lie (and the rest only gets worse). |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> for some numbers. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> typical paludis-supporter behaviour: |
| 23 |
> http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.html |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users. |
| 26 |
> rbrown&spb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> And think about that: why is there a whole bunch of paludis support threads |
| 29 |
> in |
| 30 |
> f.g.o? |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> And why is there not one for pkgcore? (hint, because it is so easy to use) |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
as i've said before: it's not fair to judge the quality of the software by |
| 38 |
its producers. i don't agree on how they behave, but that doesn't imply that |
| 39 |
if they behave in that way their software is by default bad. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives