| 1 |
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even |
| 5 |
> > > tho I'm running only a single computer |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > there is another reason not to use paludis: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > you can't go back. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > At least not easily. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That is a vicious, ridiculous lie (and the rest only gets worse). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
for some numbers. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
typical paludis-supporter behaviour: |
| 20 |
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.html |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users. |
| 23 |
rbrown&spb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
And think about that: why is there a whole bunch of paludis support threads in |
| 26 |
f.g.o? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
And why is there not one for pkgcore? (hint, because it is so easy to use) |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives