Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Wil Reichert <wil.reichert@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:47:27
Message-Id: 7a329d910811260947o7628f129x2ffab56ad93bbf2a@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore by Bob Sanders
1 On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com> wrote:
2 > Sebastian Klüsener, mused, then expounded:
3 >> I'd change that to 'march=amdfam10' or 'march=native' if your gcc is a
4 >> recent one. Recent means >=4.3.
5 >>
6 >
7 > True. I'm running stable - 4.1.2, thus that option isn't available.
8
9 Native was added in gcc 4.2. I've got a system running running all
10 stable packages with just that version of gcc unmasked, its been
11 around quite a while now & most everything in portage has no problem
12 with it.
13
14 Wil
15
16 >
17 > Bob
18 >
19 >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Sanders" <rsanders@×××.com>
20 >> To: <gentoo-amd64@l.g.o>
21 >> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:42 PM
22 >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore
23 >>
24 >>
25 >>> Fernando Boaglio, mused, then expounded:
26 >>>> Hi,
27 >>>>
28 >>>> I'm updating my old machine (AMD64 - 4200+ X2) with a AMD Phenon 9550
29 >>>> quadcore + mobo Asus M3A78.
30 >>>>
31 >>>> Should my make.conf still remains the same? =)
32 >>>>
33 >>>
34 >>> Yes. Only bump up you -j setting. Here's what I use for the
35 >>> 3-core 8450 -
36 >>>
37 >>> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=k8"
38 >>> CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
39 >>> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
40 >>> MAKEOPTS="-j5"
41 >>>
42 >>> For the 4-core 9550, -j7 should be fine.
43 >>>
44 >>> bob
45 >>>> []'s
46 >>>> Fernando Boaglio
47 >>>>
48 >>>
49 >>> --
50 >>> -
51 >>>
52 >>
53 >>
54 >>
55 >
56 > --
57 > -
58 > QA Curmudgeon. office: (408) 524-7251
59 > Wacky and bizarre testing(TM) performed while-U-wait.
60 > -
61 > See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
62 > -
63 >
64 >

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: quadcore Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>