1 |
Matt Randolph wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Simon Stelling wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> First, I didn't really want to offend you, although I have to admit |
7 |
>> that a few statements were rather harsh. I didn't feel offended, and |
8 |
>> I know you didn't want to say my answer was incompetent. However, if |
9 |
>> I *were* the questioner, I'd feel offended, since I don't need |
10 |
>> everything explained twice, and if I don't get it, I ask further |
11 |
>> questions. Generally explaining it a second time somehow implies that |
12 |
>> I didn't get it the first time, but perhaps that's just me. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
Simon Stelling wrote: |
16 |
|
17 |
> |
18 |
> Just a personal note on this: What's the point in repeating |
19 |
> everything? You only bore people with it. I think we can assume that |
20 |
> the original poster either gets it the first time, or he'll surely ask |
21 |
> again and give details about what he didn't understand. |
22 |
> |
23 |
Oops! I meant to quote you when you said it the first time. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" - W. of O. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |