Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Richard Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] PORTAGE_NICENESS
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:41:11
Message-Id: 46750EBE.80209@thefreemanclan.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] PORTAGE_NICENESS by Peter Humphrey
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Peter Humphrey wrote:
5 >
6 > The kernel includes three schedulers: anticipatory, deadline and (the
7 > default) CFQ, whereas the author refers only to "old" and "new" schedulers.
8 > I wonder which of the features he describes are common to all three. I also
9 > wonder which kernel version introduced the "new" scheduler. I have a reason
10 > for this interest, which I intend to describe in a separate thread.
11 >
12
13 Those are the IO schedulers. He was referring to the O(1) process
14 scheduler. The former handles block device contention, the latter
15 handles CPU contention. Both are important, but these days IO
16 scheduling is more likely to be the source of slowness...
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
19 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
20
21 iD8DBQFGdQ62G4/rWKZmVWkRAj+dAJ9IrfodLG3xCywqJnkMJRvZMkgBXQCgjNQK
22 alBSbxDT3aL6RCLEZZbWBIo=
23 =Gudr
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachments

File name MIME type
smime.p7s application/x-pkcs7-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] PORTAGE_NICENESS Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk>