1 |
Openwrt's build system is great. But as others have said running any non |
2 |
single purpose router at your edge has a lot of drawbacks. Not least that |
3 |
usable pcie wireless cards that work well in station mode are expensive. |
4 |
Whereas you can get the same chip in wifi router form for pennies AND you |
5 |
get a whole SoC platform and switch to go with it. You can always use you |
6 |
general purpose machine as a router and have the AP just be your air |
7 |
interface. But seriously Openwrt is MUCH easier to manage and cheaper. |
8 |
On May 25, 2016 10:49 AM, "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
Joel Wirāmu Pauling posted on Tue, 24 May 2016 22:04:02 -0700 as |
11 |
excerpted: |
12 |
|
13 |
[N replaced with G in a followup, editing it inline here to help anyone |
14 |
who finds only this post later.] |
15 |
|
16 |
> [G} DOES NOT HELP at hotels. [G] over 2.4ghz forces ALL stations on that |
17 |
> broadcast bandwidth (yes even those not participating) to downgrade to |
18 |
> Legacy mode ( this behaviour is stupid, but that's what we get for |
19 |
> backwards compatibility of mac80211 that should hace been abandonded |
20 |
> after G for a complete redesign ). And there is always some device in |
21 |
> hotels that ensures you will almost never get anything useable out on |
22 |
> 2.4ghz channels. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> 5ghz (a and ac or a+n) ammeloriates this, and because of the narroweer |
25 |
> and more abundant bands and channel options. |
26 |
|
27 |
Valuable tip. Thanks! |
28 |
|
29 |
> The chances are however likely you're get shapped to hell by their |
30 |
> captive portal before either of these issues. That class of hotel in the |
31 |
> states you will be lucky with 3 mbit per device, be happy with 10 or 15 |
32 |
> for the premium paid step option. |
33 |
|
34 |
3 Mbit... isn't the 640 Kbit I was using on DSL for awhile. AFAIK 3 Mbit |
35 |
was what the cable modem was capped at when I first got cable internet. |
36 |
(Some places were 1.5 Mbit still but Cox had upgraded most of their |
37 |
territory to 3 Mbit by that point.) It's usable. I just won't be able |
38 |
to do package sources updates and watch youtube at 1080p any longer. I |
39 |
may not be able to do 1080p without buffering at all. But 720p for a few |
40 |
months won't kill me, especially since a lot of content is either 720p |
41 |
original/max or 1080p still image anyway. |
42 |
|
43 |
> As others have said it is time to replace your G device (not least |
44 |
> because you are a culprit of said above behaviour ;-) ... you can get |
45 |
> 3x3 dual band dual proc ath9k+ath10k routers that are openwrt-able for |
46 |
> 50-70$ (i liked the tplink ac1750 v2 As a budget buy, but i hear the |
47 |
> v3's require using lftp mode to flash ). |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Look on openwrt.org for suggestions. |
50 |
|
51 |
Makes sense. |
52 |
|
53 |
Ultimately I want to put together an amd64-based router, as I said, in |
54 |
ordered to be able to put gentoo on it, and build at least base packages |
55 |
for it and my main machine at the same time. The problem I'm hoping to |
56 |
solve is that openwrt is great, but it's different than my main machine |
57 |
and single purpose, so I really don't have time to learn how to master it |
58 |
properly. Similarly, when I had an x86 netbook, I had a 32-bit chroot |
59 |
image on the main machine to build its packages, but I found it was lucky |
60 |
to get upgrades once a year, which made them always a major pain. So I |
61 |
decided making everything amd64 based and building most packages only |
62 |
once, was definitely the way to go. |
63 |
|
64 |
But $50-70 for temporary solution of a few months, and as a fallback when |
65 |
I do get the amd64-based router, isn't bad and can be considered a minor |
66 |
expense associated with the temporary, especially given that I'll not be |
67 |
having to worry about rent or utilities. I /may/ not even worry about |
68 |
reflashing it to openwrt, but I definitely want to keep the option open, |
69 |
so want an openwrt compatible device. |
70 |
|
71 |
> Bridge mode is a BS proprietary method ONLY implemented on bcm2xxx |
72 |
> chips. You can achieve what you want with relayd (Bridges l2 broadcast |
73 |
> domain of ANY two networks regardless) on ANY router running openwrt. |
74 |
|
75 |
Thanks. Another valuable tip. =:^) |
76 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
I'll be working thru Friday, but have the weekend and early next week |
79 |
(thru Wednesday anyway) off for the move. So unless I simply reconfigure |
80 |
the G for the first few days and see how it goes, I'll probably make the |
81 |
trip to Fry's Sat/Sun/Mon, of course cross-checking frys.com against the |
82 |
openwrt site to get an openwrt compatible before I go. |
83 |
|
84 |
|
85 |
So there's a few more days left for recommendations if anyone else has |
86 |
any. =:^) |
87 |
|
88 |
-- |
89 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
90 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
91 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |