| 1 |
Thanks for the clarification. Taking this in consideration, I don't |
| 2 |
think glibc will not compiled on FreeBSD without patching it. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Frank |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Le 06-06-29 à 14:43, James Colannino a écrit : |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> François Saint-Jacques wrote: |
| 10 |
>> I'm not sure if this is correct, but FreeBSD's glibc is not the |
| 11 |
>> same as |
| 12 |
>> GNU-glibc. Like the entire userland, it was developped by the FreeBSD |
| 13 |
>> dev-team. This means that there is no NTPL in this version of glibc |
| 14 |
>> because it's not the same sources as the GNU-glibc on Linux. This |
| 15 |
>> is due |
| 16 |
>> to the fact that glibc depends mostly on kernel calls wich are not |
| 17 |
>> the |
| 18 |
>> same on the FreeBSD kernel vs Linux. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I believe that it's not even referred to as glibc but rather as libc |
| 21 |
> (the g prefix is usually present on *BSD to denote GNU developed |
| 22 |
> software; gmake as opposed to make for example.) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> James |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> gentoo-bsd@g.o mailing list |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-bsd@g.o mailing list |
Archives