| 1 |
François Saint-Jacques wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm not sure if this is correct, but FreeBSD's glibc is not the same as |
| 3 |
> GNU-glibc. Like the entire userland, it was developped by the FreeBSD |
| 4 |
> dev-team. This means that there is no NTPL in this version of glibc |
| 5 |
> because it's not the same sources as the GNU-glibc on Linux. This is due |
| 6 |
> to the fact that glibc depends mostly on kernel calls wich are not the |
| 7 |
> same on the FreeBSD kernel vs Linux. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I believe that it's not even referred to as glibc but rather as libc |
| 10 |
(the g prefix is usually present on *BSD to denote GNU developed |
| 11 |
software; gmake as opposed to make for example.) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
James |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-bsd@g.o mailing list |
Archives