| 1 |
I'm not sure if this is correct, but FreeBSD's glibc is not the same |
| 2 |
as GNU-glibc. Like the entire userland, it was developped by the |
| 3 |
FreeBSD dev-team. This means that there is no NTPL in this version of |
| 4 |
glibc because it's not the same sources as the GNU-glibc on Linux. |
| 5 |
This is due to the fact that glibc depends mostly on kernel calls |
| 6 |
wich are not the same on the FreeBSD kernel vs Linux. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Like I said, I could be totaly wrong. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Frank |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Le 06-06-29 à 13:27, Artem Gr a écrit : |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> There is a lot of linux binaries, for whose it is often troublesome |
| 17 |
> or impossible to compile a FreeBSD counterpart. For example, there |
| 18 |
> is the Java beta builds or NetBeans and Eclipse java dynamic |
| 19 |
> libraries. Linux compatibility in FreeBSD is inferior to run these, |
| 20 |
> for example, Java is known to crash the FreeBSD system when running |
| 21 |
> in linux compatibility mode, and there is no plans i've heard of to |
| 22 |
> support NPTL threads in FreeBSD linux emulation. |
| 23 |
> My question is: |
| 24 |
> a) Does Gentoo under FreeBSD compiles the standard Linux libc |
| 25 |
> there, that is, do we have linux libc which talks directly to |
| 26 |
> FreeBSD kernel, and not to the FreeBSD linux kernel emulation? |
| 27 |
> b) If so, is it possible to compile libc with NPTL support under |
| 28 |
> Gentoo/FreeBSD? |
| 29 |
> c) Is it possible to run Linux binaries under Gentoo/FreeBSD, |
| 30 |
> having them linked to Gentoo=Linux libc, but using FreeBSD (and not |
| 31 |
> linux emulation) kernel? |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> gentoo-bsd@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-bsd@g.o mailing list |
Archives