Gentoo Archives: gentoo-cluster

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-cluster@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-cluster] using Portland Group fortran for lam-mpi
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:29:41
Message-Id: 443460C2.30002@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-cluster] using Portland Group fortran for lam-mpi by Bryan Green
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Bryan Green wrote:
5 > Interesting question. Is there a difference?
6 > I am under the impression that lam-mpi needs to be built with pgf for
7 > programs that use lam-mpi to be built with pgf. Am I mistaken?
8 > I any case, I found that I get get it to build by setting the FC environment
9 > variable. My initial error was apparently caused because of the lack of a
10 > license server setting.
11
12 Good to hear it! If you ever come across an ebuild where FC/F77, CC, or
13 CXX aren't respected, please file a bug.
14
15 Thanks,
16 Donnie
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
19 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
20
21 iD8DBQFENGDCXVaO67S1rtsRAl4OAJ0RlEnM3fDvxBTzRvMApVWHxue+8wCgvuxU
22 +xxlBjNGvueLX9cVCuD9M6I=
23 =Stmf
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 --
26 gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list