| 1 |
Interesting question. Is there a difference? |
| 2 |
I am under the impression that lam-mpi needs to be built with pgf for |
| 3 |
programs that use lam-mpi to be built with pgf. Am I mistaken? |
| 4 |
I any case, I found that I get get it to build by setting the FC environment |
| 5 |
variable. My initial error was apparently caused because of the lack of a |
| 6 |
license server setting. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-bryan |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
"Jared Greenwald" writes: |
| 11 |
> Are you talking about building lam-mpi with the portland group |
| 12 |
> compilers or building programs that use lam-mpi with the portland |
| 13 |
> group compilers? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -Jared |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> On 4/5/06, Bryan Green <bgreen@××××××××.gov> wrote: |
| 18 |
> > Does anyone know how to set lam-mpi to use the the Portland Group fortran |
| 19 |
> > compiler? The configure script has a -with-fc argument, as well as claimin |
| 20 |
> g |
| 21 |
> > to check the FC environment variable. But my first attempt caused the |
| 22 |
> > configure script to fail. |
| 23 |
> > Has anyone else been able to use the Portland compilers as an alternative w |
| 24 |
> hen |
| 25 |
> > emerging other packages? |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > -bryan |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list |
Archives