Gentoo Archives: gentoo-cluster

From: Brady Catherman <bradyc@××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-cluster@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-cluster] Compiler choice
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:01:11
Message-Id: 2817DC9C-2FB8-49CC-8EE8-DA3657EB680C@uidaho.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-cluster] Compiler choice by Donnie Berkholz
1 It is my understanding that GCC 4.1 is considered totally unstable on
2 gentoo. Anyways.. how would I go about getting the IBM compiler..
3 Ibm's web page flat out sucks for searching for things like that..
4
5
6 On Apr 13, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
7
8 > Brady Catherman wrote:
9 >> Anyways, the Apple run of HPL was compiled against the Accelerate
10 >> framework while the Gentoo side was compiled against the most
11 >> recent Goto libraries (in January 2006). The Apple side was
12 >> compiled with a custom version of GCC 4.0.2 (XCode doesn't come
13 >> with fortran) and the Linux side was compiled with GCC 4.0.2 from
14 >> Gentoo's ebuild.
15 >
16 > If you want to use gcc rather than the IBM compilers, please use
17 > 4.1. It has a large number of improvements relative to 4.0
18 > (particularly relevant ones in gfortran), and is the one that will
19 > eventually enter ~arch.
20 >
21 > Thanks,
22 > Donnie
23 > --
24 > gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list
25 >
26
27 --
28 gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-cluster] Compiler choice Justin Bronder <jsbronder@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-cluster] Compiler choice Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>