Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:55
Message-Id: 1211317312.11979.1@spike
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next? by Donnie Berkholz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2008.05.20 21:31, Donnie Berkholz wrote:

[snip]

> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from > the council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some > options that have been mentioned: > > 1) Have an election now;
After a week, I don't see how the council can do anything else.
> > 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have > elections;
A vote about a vote seems like wasting time if you don't get the answer you want.
> 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these > reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a > council > majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or
Too late.
> > 4) Something else. (What?) > > Which one do you prefer?
Whatever you do you will upset someone. Its only 6 weeks until the normal election process kicks off anyway, so may as well go for it early and add 'fix GLEP 39' to your manifestos.
> > Thanks, > Donnie > -- > gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list >
I hope you all stand again. Its the GLEP that's broken, not the council but to gain a clear mandate to fix it, it looks like you have to go to the electorate. - -- Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgzPEAACgkQTE4/y7nJvauhYwCePNPvZZuTbho17H7lE68FLsaj c0oAmwafhhiOGItXWa5p/aNLgq7LCHCL =19r9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next? Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>