Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: "Petteri R├Ąty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:31:10
Message-Id: 4978C99A.6030107@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 by Donnie Berkholz
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 18:23 Thu 22 Jan , Tobias Scherbaum wrote: >> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> Discuss on-list before meeting >>> --------------------------------------- >>> - Council meta stuff (-council) >>> - Can the size change? Minimum? Maximum? >>> - Should we have 2-year staggered terms? >> I'm in favor of a fixed size of council members, I'd like to see at >> least 5 council members *if* developers want to change the size. > > What is your reasoning for this? >
I would give the devs the possibility to restrict the council size if they so want to do.
> > Just as a point of reference, the council has voted to change GLEP 39 in > the past. I definitely feel that we need to hold this discussion > publicly and get input from everyone. I think the council should then > take all this input into consideration and vote upon it. >
I guess it depends on the scope of the changes. We can always vote whether we want to hold a general vote on the issue :) Regards, Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature