Gentoo Archives: gentoo-desktop

From: Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-desktop@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop] kde-sunset: Calling base_src_prepare from kde.eclass
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:59:27
Message-Id: 17c6771e1002220358j2e9714fay708b12df5a0a26e1@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-desktop] kde-sunset: Calling base_src_prepare from kde.eclass by Chris Bandy
On 22 February 2010 03:23, Chris Bandy <cbandy@××××××.com> wrote:
> Martin von Gagern wrote: >> On 21.02.2010 15:53, Chris Bandy wrote: >> >>> As a more comprehensive test, I rebuilt everything I had in >>> kde-sunset[1].  Everything regarding PATCHES worked great! >>> >> >> Thanks a lot, I appreciate that testing! >> >> >>> However, I had to make three changes to individual ebuilds: >>> >>> 1. Had to remove x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.8-libpng14.patch because it was not >>> in the Manifest >>> >> >> Committed by Ladislav in f7ba03a46f179acb658a9775a75972fa3d2b68c5 >> >> >>> 2. Had to modify app-text/poppler/poppler-0.12.3-r3.ebuild as described >>> here: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6170313.html#6170313 >>> >> >> Committed by me in 5ba737169016a164646bbfe1da53cbf7f34d137f >> >> >>> 3. Had to revert kde-base/kdepim-kresources-3.5.10.ebuild back to EAPI=1 >>> >> >> Committed by Ladislav in 5be5829c56380ca6ff08775d814558d936f816cc >> >> >>> I've attached a log for the failed EAPI=2 build in #3. >>> >> >> I've had a look. Could reproduce the issue here, and could diff both >> runs. One of the first differences I noted was this: >> >> EAPI=1: checking if libkcal should be compiled... no >> EAPI=2: checking if libkcal should be compiled... yes >> >> This output is, of course, from configure. If you look at the ebuild, >> you notice that it disables libkcal via an environment variable: >> >> src_compile() { >>       export DO_NOT_COMPILE="knotes libkcal" >> >> This is only done in src_compile, i.e. after src_configure has already >> completed. Only in EAPI=1, where there is no src_configure phase, but >> instead a configure stage of the kde-meta_src_compile function, setting >> the variable in this fashion gives the desired result. >> >> I've written a EAPI=2 version of the ebuild that avoids these issues. It >> works for me, so I decided to commit it, just in case we'll want to use >> EAPI=2 in the future. >> >> Committed by me in 1a496ce8440c3b8781be988df65ecc77ea267e6b >> >> Greetings, >>  Martin von Gagern >> > > I re-emerged everything I had in kde-sunset[1] again.  No build errors; > everything works!  Thanks! > > [1] 1a496ce8440c3b8781be988df65ecc77ea267e6b > > -- Chris > >
I've managed to rebuild most of KDE 3.5 against the new jpeg-8 library using the overlay. Many thanks for maintaining it! I think the removal from the main tree is premature. Not only is KDE 4 still an unstable resource hog, but the KOffice developers explicitly state that 2.1: 'is not aimed at end users, and we do not recommend Linux distributions to package it as the default office suite yet.' http://www.koffice.org/news/koffice-2-1-released/ Whoever removed it from the main tree has completely ignored this and decided to ship an incomplete office suite to users for the own convenience. -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-desktop] Re: kde-sunset: Calling base_src_prepare from kde.eclass Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>