| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 31/10/12 17:09, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300 |
| 5 |
>> Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100 |
| 8 |
>>> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
>>> [...] |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> A bit aggressive but its rather obvious that this is the norm not the |
| 15 |
>>> exception, meaning the argument 'I do not want to diverge from |
| 16 |
>>> $other eclass' is moot. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> It's aggressive because Samuli has a history of touching (and sometimes |
| 20 |
>> breaking) other people's packages without even asking or pinging that |
| 21 |
>> he did that, and believing he's above all the rules here. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> You don't know me clearly, that's definately the opposite of what I'm doing |
| 25 |
> and intending to do, walking the fine line and bothering people only when |
| 26 |
> something real changes... |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Breaking? Hardly, since I never commit untested code, and the exceptions |
| 29 |
> I've fixed myself usually very quickly as I'm watching incoming bugs, |
| 30 |
> forums, and more |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> I'm being cooperative with you and keeping udev.eclass with systemd.eclass |
| 33 |
> sort of 'in sync' due to the nature of both |
| 34 |
> packages being from the same tarball. What more do you want? Seriously. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Please stop _NOW_. The thread is about the eclass review. Either |
| 38 |
comment on that or go flame somewhere else. |
| 39 |
Did he break your eclass this time or is this a preemptive complain |
| 40 |
just in case he does in the future? |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
Regards, |
| 44 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
Archives