| 1 |
On 31/10/12 17:09, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300 |
| 3 |
> Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100 |
| 6 |
>> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> [...] |
| 8 |
>>> Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> A bit aggressive but its rather obvious that this is the norm not the |
| 11 |
>> exception, meaning the argument 'I do not want to diverge from |
| 12 |
>> $other eclass' is moot. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> It's aggressive because Samuli has a history of touching (and sometimes |
| 15 |
> breaking) other people's packages without even asking or pinging that |
| 16 |
> he did that, and believing he's above all the rules here. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
You don't know me clearly, that's definately the opposite of what I'm |
| 20 |
doing and intending to do, walking the fine line and bothering people |
| 21 |
only when something real changes... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Breaking? Hardly, since I never commit untested code, and the exceptions |
| 24 |
I've fixed myself usually very quickly as I'm watching incoming bugs, |
| 25 |
forums, and more |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I'm being cooperative with you and keeping udev.eclass with |
| 28 |
systemd.eclass sort of 'in sync' due to the nature of both |
| 29 |
packages being from the same tarball. What more do you want? Seriously. |
Archives