| 1 |
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 15:16:49 -0800 |
| 2 |
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> So Thomáš posted today [1] that the new LibreOffice 4 is going to _need_ |
| 5 |
> an LDAP provider in the future because they are not going to keep it |
| 6 |
> optional as it is now. Right now, the only provider we have in portage |
| 7 |
> (as far as me and him can tell) is openldap (although mozldap also exists). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This made me cringe for a moment because I really don't want to have the |
| 10 |
> OpenLDAP server installed on my laptops, but then I realize that there |
| 11 |
> _is_ a minimal USE flag that only installs the library. But of course, |
| 12 |
> that's not the default. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
How about splitting the ebuild into separate library and server |
| 15 |
and fixing the deps? It would be cleaner for people, and we'd just |
| 16 |
release a news message that those who need an LDAP server, need to put |
| 17 |
it in their @world. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives