| 1 |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> For instance, the systemd-tmpfiles implementation has some |
| 4 |
> features concerning btrfs which are not (yet) supported by |
| 5 |
> opentmpfiles. Some users might want to use that features. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Well, this was the main reason I suggested that we could just use |
| 9 |
systemd-tmpfiles. It is essentially everybody's reference |
| 10 |
implementation already. But, if somebody wants to re-implement it |
| 11 |
that is their right, and certainly the virtual is the way to go about |
| 12 |
it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Rich |
Archives