Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories?
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:36:21
Message-Id: CA+czFiBNa9ueh8Y4XO4DtpxqLwMUGzE9eKg-6b6cOvYLnPCNmw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories? by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
2 >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
3 >
4 >> On 20.12.2012 19:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 >>> The tree is a database. It belongs in /var/db/.
6 >
7 >> I don't see /var/db in the latest release of the Filesystem
8 >> Hierarchy Standard:
9 >
10 >> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEVARHIERARCHY
11 >
12 > Wrong standard to choose from. ;-) /var/db/ is already required by the
13 > PMS for /var/db/pkg/.
14 >
15 >> I would prefer something that blends with FHS.
16 >
17 > Is this important for a Gentoo specific directory?
18 >
19 > /var/db/portage/ PORTDIR
20 > /var/db/layman/ layman storage
21 > /var/db/pkg/ VDB (no change)
22 > /usr/local/portage/ local overlays (no change)
23 > /var/cache/distfiles/ DISTDIR
24 > /var/cache/packages/ PKGDIR
25 >
26 > Alternatively, the last two could be under
27 > /var/cache/portage/{distfiles,packages}/.
28
29 Query that's been percolating in my mind...how much of this is
30 specific to Gentoo, and how much has strong overlap with closely
31 related distros like Sabayon and Funtoo?
32
33 --
34 :wq