Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories?
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:09:05
Message-Id: 20696.7037.210881.419316@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories? by Sebastian Pipping
1 >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
2
3 > On 20.12.2012 19:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 >> The tree is a database. It belongs in /var/db/.
5
6 > I don't see /var/db in the latest release of the Filesystem
7 > Hierarchy Standard:
8
9 > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEVARHIERARCHY
10
11 Wrong standard to choose from. ;-) /var/db/ is already required by the
12 PMS for /var/db/pkg/.
13
14 > I would prefer something that blends with FHS.
15
16 Is this important for a Gentoo specific directory?
17
18 /var/db/portage/ PORTDIR
19 /var/db/layman/ layman storage
20 /var/db/pkg/ VDB (no change)
21 /usr/local/portage/ local overlays (no change)
22 /var/cache/distfiles/ DISTDIR
23 /var/cache/packages/ PKGDIR
24
25 Alternatively, the last two could be under
26 /var/cache/portage/{distfiles,packages}/.
27
28 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories? "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories? Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories? "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories? "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o>