| 1 |
On 21 December 2012 18:02, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21 December 2012 17:36, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 3 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 +0000 |
| 5 |
>> Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like the |
| 7 |
>>> existing policy, bring it to the list with a better |
| 8 |
>>> attitude so we can try and discuss it. But given that you want to pick |
| 9 |
>>> a fight with your email, I will most likely ignore this |
| 10 |
>>> thread and keep doing our job like we do for many years. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m93x01rSVK1qjvxfho1_1280.jpg |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And that also makes a convenient way to always ignore the tone of an |
| 15 |
> argument, regardless of whether it is justified or not. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I find that Markos' objection is not unfounded and your argument is |
| 18 |
> irrelevant here. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
To expand on that a bit -- it's fair game to discuss whether we should |
| 21 |
give more leeway before pinging idle devs, but pouncing on the people |
| 22 |
doing to work of trying to make sure packages don't fall off the radar |
| 23 |
and remain unmaintained is counter-productive and detrimental. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Arun Raghavan |
| 27 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
| 28 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |
Archives
