| 1 |
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:14:11 +1000 |
| 2 |
Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 26/09/2013 20:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:51:26 +1000 |
| 5 |
> > Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> There isn't a 100% perfect solution currently, and I agree that |
| 7 |
> >> hurrying people will simply move us from "not enough rebuilds" to |
| 8 |
> >> "too many rebuilds". |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > This is still a huge improvement. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> At the same time, it's also a huge regression. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It's only a regression if you think "occasional unnecessary recompiles" |
| 15 |
is a problem. And if you do think it's a problem, there are better |
| 16 |
things to change to "fix" it, such as allowing full recompiles to be |
| 17 |
avoided for minor changes to a package. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives