1 |
On 12/20/2012 03:00 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> sorry for the format, this was |
5 |
> Sent from my iPhone |
6 |
> |
7 |
> On 2012-12-20, at 4:51 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
> |
9 |
>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:09:45 -0500 |
10 |
>> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
12 |
>>> wrote: |
13 |
>>>> On 12/18/2012 11:58 PM, Duncan wrote: |
14 |
>>>>> I didn't know that. Last I knew, stable portage had special-case |
15 |
>>>>> acceptance of @system and @world to prepare the way, but I hadn't |
16 |
>>>>> seen that full /etc/portage/sets/* and /var/lib/portage/world_sets |
17 |
>>>>> support was stabilized. |
18 |
>>>>> |
19 |
>>>>> If indeed it is as you say, I've even more to rejoice about! =:^) |
20 |
>>>> |
21 |
>>>> Yeah, it's only been in stable for a few months now, so lots of |
22 |
>>>> people aren't aware of it yet. |
23 |
>>>> |
24 |
>>>> The current list available in portage-2.1.10.x, reported by emerge |
25 |
>>>> --list-sets is: |
26 |
>>>> |
27 |
>>>> preserved-rebuild |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> If @preserved-rebuild and the corresponding FEATURES=preserve-libs are |
30 |
>>> now stable, we should create a news item about this. |
31 |
>>> |
32 |
>>> Otherwise people will still be running revdep-rebuild a decade from |
33 |
>>> now, as this feature was never formally announced as far as I'm aware, |
34 |
>>> and all the mentions of it were ages ago and not available to stable |
35 |
>>> users at the time. |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>> We really shouldn't... EAPI 5 is the way to go, not preserve-libs. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> preserved-libs complements EAPI5, it should not disappear. |
41 |
|
42 |
Plus, if we are somehow able to do away with preserve-libs then we also |
43 |
need to ban preserve_old_lib from eutils.eclass, since it's the same |
44 |
thing only worse due to its lack of automatic garbage collection. |
45 |
-- |
46 |
Thanks, |
47 |
Zac |