Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage sets support Was: Defaulting for debug information in profiles
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:01:32
Message-Id: 344086CD-A3A1-4F56-9DE1-66B167CA04CC@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage sets support Was: Defaulting for debug information in profiles by Ciaran McCreesh
1 sorry for the format, this was
2 Sent from my iPhone
3
4 On 2012-12-20, at 4:51 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
5
6 > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:09:45 -0500
7 > Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
8 >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
9 >> wrote:
10 >>> On 12/18/2012 11:58 PM, Duncan wrote:
11 >>>> I didn't know that. Last I knew, stable portage had special-case
12 >>>> acceptance of @system and @world to prepare the way, but I hadn't
13 >>>> seen that full /etc/portage/sets/* and /var/lib/portage/world_sets
14 >>>> support was stabilized.
15 >>>>
16 >>>> If indeed it is as you say, I've even more to rejoice about! =:^)
17 >>>
18 >>> Yeah, it's only been in stable for a few months now, so lots of
19 >>> people aren't aware of it yet.
20 >>>
21 >>> The current list available in portage-2.1.10.x, reported by emerge
22 >>> --list-sets is:
23 >>>
24 >>> preserved-rebuild
25 >>
26 >> If @preserved-rebuild and the corresponding FEATURES=preserve-libs are
27 >> now stable, we should create a news item about this.
28 >>
29 >> Otherwise people will still be running revdep-rebuild a decade from
30 >> now, as this feature was never formally announced as far as I'm aware,
31 >> and all the mentions of it were ages ago and not available to stable
32 >> users at the time.
33 >
34 > We really shouldn't... EAPI 5 is the way to go, not preserve-libs.
35 >
36
37 preserved-libs complements EAPI5, it should not disappear.

Replies