Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 02:38:36
Message-Id: 20160719143745.012d542f@katipo2.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection by waltdnes@waltdnes.org
1 On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:21:22 -0400
2 waltdnes@××××××××.org wrote:
3
4 > I'm amazed that "robust linux servers" are deathly afraid of simply
5 > setting the time, and being done with it.
6
7 There's problems at the software level everywhere that are not so
8 simply solved.
9
10 A more obvious example is in the event your system time gets *ahead* of
11 real-time.
12
13 Then its likely that some actions have been performed that have to only
14 happen once at a given time, and a time going back in time results in
15 "double spending" of some seconds, and that's obviously not great.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>