| 1 |
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:01:32 -0500 |
| 2 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 01:04:17AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:49:59PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote |
| 7 |
> >> > |
| 8 |
> >> > So, should we clean up / rename packages that do not follow this as we |
| 9 |
> >> > find them, like my ConfigArgParse example? |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> find /usr/portage -name *.ebuild | grep [A-Z] | sed "s/-[0-9].*//" | sort -u > upper.txt |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > There's a double-packaged case that stands out: |
| 14 |
> > dev-python/shapely |
| 15 |
> > sci-libs/Shapely |
| 16 |
> > (Both use the same pypi source) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Thanks for pointing that out. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> It looks like sci-libs/Shapely has been around longer, so I have |
| 21 |
> converted reverse deps on dev-python/shapely over to it and masked the |
| 22 |
> latter. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
There is a bug open for 3 weeks now [1]. I'm surprised that nobody |
| 25 |
fixed it before. Could you update it, please? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/599306 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
Michał Górny |
| 32 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives