| 1 |
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 01:04:17AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:49:59PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote |
| 4 |
>> > |
| 5 |
>> > So, should we clean up / rename packages that do not follow this as we |
| 6 |
>> > find them, like my ConfigArgParse example? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> find /usr/portage -name *.ebuild | grep [A-Z] | sed "s/-[0-9].*//" | sort -u > upper.txt |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> There's a double-packaged case that stands out: |
| 11 |
> dev-python/shapely |
| 12 |
> sci-libs/Shapely |
| 13 |
> (Both use the same pypi source) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Thanks for pointing that out. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It looks like sci-libs/Shapely has been around longer, so I have |
| 18 |
converted reverse deps on dev-python/shapely over to it and masked the |
| 19 |
latter. |
Archives