1 |
Michael Mol posted on Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:51:09 -0500 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>> My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and |
9 |
>> apparently most others, don't bother to read. |
10 |
|
11 |
>>> the tragic thing is that guy would be able to make valuable |
12 |
>>> contributions if it weren't for the excessive length of his mails |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> So, your emails are way too long. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> I dunno. I read them. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Duncan, I think the clue here, though, is that you should start a blog. |
19 |
> I'd read that, too. :) |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks, all. . |
22 |
|
23 |
It's not everyone. I have a stack of replies thanking me for explaining |
24 |
<whatever> that no one took the time to do in a way they could understand |
25 |
before. But I think computer folks often take intuitive leaps faster |
26 |
than many and thus don't need it all spelled out repeatedly, as others |
27 |
often seem to, and I don't "consider the audience". Yes, things often |
28 |
can tighten up with a bit of effort. |
29 |
|
30 |
Ironic after all those "two page minimum" assignments on material easily |
31 |
covered in one paragraph of two sentences totaling five lines... I |
32 |
learned that lesson /too/ well. |
33 |
|
34 |
But if I shorten it, invariably someone catches me out with an exception |
35 |
I considered but cut for brevity, so the discussion ends up longer and |
36 |
takes more round trips than it would if I hadn't, and I go back to the |
37 |
long form the next time. =:^( |
38 |
|
39 |
I probably /should/ start a blog. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
43 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
44 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |