| 1 |
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:54:46 +0200 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Somebody is thinking the PMS and the EAPI definition as it is are |
| 6 |
> wrong and should be replaced since they aren't useful for their |
| 7 |
> purpose. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Anyone thinking that has a very limited understanding of how things |
| 10 |
work. Let's face it, there hasn't been any correct criticism, and any |
| 11 |
complaints have been from people who don't understand what's going on |
| 12 |
anyway and who seek to blame EAPI for Portage's lack of progress, |
| 13 |
rather than blaming Portage's lack of progress for lack of new EAPIs |
| 14 |
as they should. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives