| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Anyone thinking that has a very limited understanding of how things |
| 3 |
> work. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Usually in this category you put everybody that disagrees with you, no |
| 6 |
matter the topic. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Let's face it, there hasn't been any correct criticism, and any |
| 9 |
> complaints have been from people who don't understand what's going on |
| 10 |
> anyway and who seek to blame EAPI for Portage's lack of progress, |
| 11 |
> rather than blaming Portage's lack of progress for lack of new EAPIs |
| 12 |
> as they should. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'm afraid you are mixing up emails from this thread. I got complaints |
| 15 |
about how wrongly the PMS is written, e.g. academic paper markup vs |
| 16 |
plain text, natural language used to specify syntax while a grammar |
| 17 |
notation like EBNF would be better suited, when I asked people why so |
| 18 |
few were contributing about this document. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
lu |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Luca Barbato |
| 25 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 26 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 27 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives