From: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union | ||
Date: | Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:14:32 | ||
Message-Id: | 4454A9BE.50700@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union by Alexandre Buisse |
1 | Alexandre Buisse wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > |
4 | > [1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.html |
5 | > [2] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/bzr-eval/ |
6 | > [3] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/dcm_evaluation_mercurial/ |
7 | > [4] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt |
8 | > |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | Those figures are slightly old, some of the issues are probably |
12 | addressed both on mercurial and git. |
13 | |
14 | I'd say that both are nice and are probably a good solution. |
15 | |
16 | if there is space and cpu I'd like to have someone playing with them and |
17 | send benchmark results. |
18 | |
19 | Mercurial should use a bit less disk and git should be a little faster |
20 | and with better merge/conflict resolution features. |
21 | |
22 | lu |
23 | |
24 | -- |
25 | |
26 | Luca Barbato |
27 | |
28 | Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
29 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
30 | |
31 | -- |
32 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |