Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:14:32
Message-Id: 4454A9BE.50700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union by Alexandre Buisse
1 Alexandre Buisse wrote:
2
3 >
4 > [1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.html
5 > [2] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/bzr-eval/
6 > [3] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/dcm_evaluation_mercurial/
7 > [4] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt
8 >
9
10
11 Those figures are slightly old, some of the issues are probably
12 addressed both on mercurial and git.
13
14 I'd say that both are nice and are probably a good solution.
15
16 if there is space and cpu I'd like to have someone playing with them and
17 send benchmark results.
18
19 Mercurial should use a bit less disk and git should be a little faster
20 and with better merge/conflict resolution features.
21
22 lu
23
24 --
25
26 Luca Barbato
27
28 Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
29 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
30
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>