1 |
Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> [snip: reasons for keeping official documentation static] |
4 |
|
5 |
There are advantages in allowing the documentation to be dynamic, but I |
6 |
won't mention them because there is no need for such I discussion. As I |
7 |
believe I stated in the message to which you replied, I would not |
8 |
suggest that a wiki be used for official documentation -- rather, I |
9 |
would suggest that it be used for development of documents prior to |
10 |
publication as official documentation and for hosting and development of |
11 |
documentation that is not likely to become official (such as the |
12 |
tutorials currently found in the forums). |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard |