| 1 |
On 01/20/11 21:45, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on |
| 4 |
>> these developer-related lists. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Tend to agree, at least in general. If a genkernel upgrade impacted |
| 7 |
> multiple teams/etc, such as requiring changes to install media, or the |
| 8 |
> handbooks, etc, then I'd consider it completely fair game for the |
| 9 |
> lists. Likewise if some big change that will really impact the distro |
| 10 |
> is being considered I'd consider that fair game as well. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Fair point. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'll keep posting to Planet Gentoo. How about gentoo-dev-announce? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> That said, there are some nice genkernel changes being made and I for |
| 18 |
> one appreciate them (even though I don't yet run it - the mdadm |
| 19 |
> inclusion will probably push me over the edge)! |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If you get the chance please try genkernel-99999 (five nines) exposing |
| 22 |
the experimental branch. That may save both of us the trouble to fix |
| 23 |
things post release. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Best, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Sebastian |
Archives