Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:03:42
Message-Id: 200611182259.41348@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited by Mike Doty
1 On Saturday 18 November 2006 22:49, Mike Doty wrote:
2 > The other option is to submit patches for X and KDE and Gnome to use a
3 > unified license.
4 Would like to precise that KDE team reports correctly as GPL-2 or LGPL-2.1 the
5 licenses for every package. The only problem there is that there's no way to
6 differentiate between GPL-2 and GPL-2+ but that's beside the point.
7
8 So no, there's no need to submit patches to the KDE team. I think the same
9 applies to GNOME, but I'll leave those who handle that to answer by
10 theirselves.
11
12 --
13 Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
14 Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ...

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>