1 |
On 02/11/15 22:08, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
2 |
> It is tailored to Facebook's workflow. Their workflow does not |
3 |
> coincide with most other people's workflow. It doesn't work for my |
4 |
> company, and I suspect it won't work for Gentoo either. |
5 |
|
6 |
Which workflow do you mean? Most features seem optional, allowing people |
7 |
to work as they wish. |
8 |
|
9 |
> On the other hand it offers a lot of neat things, so experimenting |
10 |
> with it is good. Thanks for doing this work, Michael. Hopefully it |
11 |
> will lead somewhere. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> As an alternative, that I have been meaning to look at, there's |
14 |
> critic[0]. It might be useful for someone to have a look at it. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> [0] <https://critic-review.org/dashboard> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
I ran a really quick test and it looks really nice for pre-commit |
21 |
reviews. If we're looking for a "GitHub replacement" however, it seems a |
22 |
bit light on features. |