| 1 |
On 11/27/06, paul <paul@×××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> You can't take workload out of the picture since it's the main issue |
| 3 |
> here. Stable tree means backport fixes and I don't see this happening as |
| 4 |
> it can't be automated: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
"Stable tree means backport fixes" is an assumption, not a requirement. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It's one reason why the word "stable" is a poor choice for any such |
| 9 |
tree, just as it is a poor choice for the current Portage tree. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I think the original poster hit the nail on the head. The real |
| 12 |
barrier preventing a slower-moving tree is cultural. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Best regards, |
| 15 |
Stu |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives