Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:03:42
Message-Id: CAATnKFCTh5zR=MnQ7sh7K9f+TBitw4-Duccv80o7q=j2wtMLfA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Alexey Shvetsov
On 24 May 2012 05:35, Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> wrote:
> Full clone will be about 1G or so but no more then 2. If we will drop > changelog it will be much smaller >
And if you use git commit signing instead of ebuild manifests, intra-commit churn will almost be negligible. :D -- Kent perl -e  "print substr( \"edrgmaM  SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>