Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-core@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 06:16:43
Message-Id: 42805257.1090601@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal by Brian Harring
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi Brian,
5 Brian Harring schrieb:
6 > Unless someone steps up, the intel compiler toolchain
7 > packages dev-lang/icc (intel cc) and dev-lang/ifc (intel fortran
8 > compiler) are prime candidates for removal from the tree; open bugs,
9 > primary maintainer is retired, and no devs have moved in to pick up the
10 > packages, let along touched the changeslogs in around a year.
11 >
12 > So, any takers?
13 > ~brian
14
15 In case there are no security Bugs, i'd like to ask you to leave them in
16 for the time being, I'm working on getting the latest versions (8.0/8.1)
17 of ifort (how it is now known) and icc into the tree. The only problem
18 are my time constraints atm :-/. Though I have ebuilds ready, it will
19 still take some time to remove some minor itches before I'd commit them.
20
21 Danny
22 - --
23 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
24 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
25 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
27
28 iD8DBQFCgFJXaVNL8NrtU6IRAlISAJ0Q6JrytYC08+gKN3/PhsSw4WG7xwCgk3E6
29 /VpqlPPXHK36vpfQ8zjatoQ=
30 =gJtG
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies