Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, patrick@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:00:06
Message-Id: CAATnKFC9VF0xtzt5Vpk6p5Aw4GpbHBcBb=BgNktd-AfBGrvrAw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On 27 September 2013 03:10, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
2
3 >
4 > app-text/poppler
5 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462020
6
7
8 Reading this bug re-fuels my wish for virtuals to un-happen. Maintaining a
9 virtual with a massive list of || ( ) conditions is so so painful,
10 especially considering their nature being they're communicating information
11 thats better communicated in the inverse.
12
13 ie: every time there is a new iteration of Foo, one must iterate all the
14 virtuals that relate to it, and vet their need to be updated, and every
15 single update you do is just something thats easy to get wrong, when it
16 always seems to make so much more sense to say "X provides Y", especially
17 in the case where X provides a very large list of Y ( virtual/perl-* is a
18 maintenance nightmare )
19
20
21
22
23
24 --
25 Kent
26 <http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>