| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2013, 16:04:22 schrieb Kent Fredric: |
| 2 |
> On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid |
| 4 |
> > forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only |
| 5 |
> > cause more of poppler-like issues to occur. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Can you give a an example package which: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> - installs multiple libraries |
| 10 |
> - has an ABI that may change for only one of those libraries |
| 11 |
> - it is sane / plausible to expect one downstream dependent *not* to |
| 12 |
> forcibly rebuild as a result of a chane in one of those libaries |
| 13 |
> - it is sane / plausible to expect a different downstream to forcibly |
| 14 |
> rebuild as a result of changes in one of those libraries |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I'm not saying they don't exist, but having reference cases would help |
| 17 |
> discussion. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
app-text/poppler |
| 20 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462020 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) |
| 25 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 26 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives