1 |
On 04/03/10 10:50, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just |
3 |
> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a |
4 |
> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about |
5 |
> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says: |
10 |
> "We will not hide problems" |
11 |
|
12 |
Sounds good, can we at the same time get RESOLVED OBSOLETE (for bugs that are |
13 |
not valid anymore due to changed situation, RESOLVED INVALID isn't applicable in |
14 |
this case as it implies the bug is and was invalid from the begining). |
15 |
|
16 |
When we kill RESOLVED LATER maybe we could also kill RESOLVED REMIND? I don't |
17 |
remember it being very useful. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xF6A80E46 |
21 |
desktop-misc, java, apache, ppc, vim, kernel, python... |