Archives
Archives
| From: | Per Wigren <wigren@××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why not vi? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 25 May 2002 04:43:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200205251143.09910.wigren@home.se | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Why not vi? by Eric Moncrieff |
||
| 1 | Yes, I agree wholeheartly! Nano out, Vi in... |
| 2 | Vi is even available as a busybox-applet in the default unpatched |
| 3 | bosybox-distribution, so there you have even less reason to run an "external" |
| 4 | (non-busybox) editor... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | But if you DO decide to go with nano, at least make an alias nano="nano -w" by |
| 7 | default... |
| 8 | |
| 9 | // Wigren |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Why not vi? | Paul <set@×××××.com> |